User talk:Queen of Hearts
 | This user is aware of the designation of the following topics as contentious topics:
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12
Tamzin Hadasa Kelly RFD
[edit]Hello, you participated in an RFD discussion for Tamzin Hadasa Kelly, which redirects to the encyclopedia article Wikipedia administrators#Requests for adminship. However, several people (including me) misinterpreted it as a redirect to projectspace, it seemed like we couldn't have an accurate discussion, so I've closed the discussion and renominated it at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 February 2#Tamzin Hadasa Kelly. Please go there to participate again, and if your opinion at the first RFD still applies, please feel free to copy/paste your rationale from before. Nyttend (talk) 22:41, 2 February 2025 (UTC)
DYK for Crabs for Christmas
[edit]
On 3 February 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Crabs for Christmas, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the writer of "Crabs for Christmas" joked that it contributed to Baltimore's population decline? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Crabs for Christmas. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Crabs for Christmas), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
—Ganesha811 (talk) 00:03, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
January 2025 NPP backlog drive – Points award
[edit]
|
The Invisible Barnstar | |
| This award is given in recognition to Queen of Hearts for accumulating at least 5 points during the January 2025 NPP backlog drive. Your contributions helped play a part in the 16,000+ articles and 14,000+ redirects reviewed (for a total of 19,791.2 points) completed during the drive. Thank you so much for taking part and contributing to help reduce the backlog! Hey man im josh (talk) 19:39, 6 February 2025 (UTC) |
GAR
[edit]Hi, could you please revert your recent GAR closes? The closing period was recently changed to a month. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 09:50, 8 February 2025 (UTC)
- @AirshipJungleman29: Not sure how to feel about that, but I think I reverted everything. charlotte 👸♥ 19:16, 8 February 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks, and yeah, me neither. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 19:23, 8 February 2025 (UTC)
- @AirshipJungleman29: - How does this new standard interact with seemingly uncontroversial keep closes? Are my closes at Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Supermarine Spitfire/1 and Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Pine Island Glacier/1 problematic? Surely a reassessment where all involved parties agree that it should be kept is exempt from the month, right? This would also apply to one of Q of H's vacated closes - Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Ronnie Barker/1, although that articles does include a single citation to IMDB yet. Hog Farm Talk 04:58, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks, and yeah, me neither. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 19:23, 8 February 2025 (UTC)