Wampanoag-class frigate
.jpg) USS Wampanoag c. 1869, before she was renamed to Florida
| |
| Class overview | |
|---|---|
| Name | Wampanoag class |
| Builders | |
| Operators | |
| Built | 1863–1865 |
| In commission | 1866–1869 |
| Planned | 8 |
| Completed | 5 |
| Retired | 5 |
| General characteristics | |
| Type | Wooden screw frigate |
| Displacement | 3,043–4,446 short tons (2,761–4,033 t; 2,717–3,970 long tons) |
| Length | Between 298–335 ft (91–102 m) |
| Beam | Varied |
| Draft | Varied |
| Propulsion |
|
| Sail plan | Bark-rigged |
| Speed |
|
| Armament | Varied |
The Wampanoag class was a series of wooden-hulled screw frigates built for the Union Navy during the American Civil War. The ships were designed to decimate British merchant shipping in the event that the United Kingdom entered the war on the Confederate side. Of the eight ships planned, only five entered service and served brief careers. A combination of engineering, financial, and operational issues limited their practicality and service history even as the class's namesake, USS Wampanoag, was the world's fastest steamship.
Initially described as "commerce destroyers" and cruisers, the ships featured novel steam engines developed by different engineers, though three failed to reach the intended speed of 15 knots (17 mph; 28 km/h). Redundant at the end of the Civil War, their construction alarmed Britain during the Alabama Claims, prompting the Royal Navy to develop an equivalent vessel. Over time, the class's emphasis on speed over armor foreshadowed the evolution of the battlecruiser.
Development
[edit]Despite the United Kingdom's official stance of neutrality during the American Civil War, British assets were used to support the rebelling Confederacy, particularly in the development of its navy.[1][2] Shipyards in Liverpool constructed blockade runners and privateers for the Confederates, exploiting a legal loophole by ensuring the vessels were not armed until they reached Portugal. Among these ships were CSS Alabama, Florida, and Alexandra, which wreaked havoc on Union shipping; Alabama alone was responsible for destroying 65 merchant vessels.[2][3]
The Union Navy was alarmed by these developments, as the disruption of American trade routes drove up domestic prices, damaged the economy, and forced the reassignment of ships from blockade duties against the South. By 1863, the Union feared that Britain might intervene to support the Confederates directly - a scenario that would have left the Union Navy hopelessly outmatched by the Royal Navy. Faced with that prospect, the Union Navy began planning for a possible war with the United Kingdom. While the Union fleet could not match the Royal Navy in conventional battles, the plan called for employing commerce raiding. By using cruisers to launch hit-and-run attacks on British ports and merchant shipping, the Union hoped to make a war too costly for Britain to justify, ultimately forcing it back into neutrality.[4][5][6]
Design
[edit]Benjamin Isherwood, the Union Navy's Engineer-in-Chief, envisioned what he called a "commerce destroyer" for this new role. He proposed a large ship with the range to cross the Atlantic and loiter in British shipping lanes, a heavy armament capable of destroying any merchant vessels encountered, and a top speed of 15 knots (17 mph; 28 km/h) - fast enough to either overtake and attack shipping or evade the Royal Navy. To achieve this, his design incorporated both sails and steam engines. While steam engines of the era provided high speeds, they consumed an immense amount of fuel, making them only practical for combat. Outside of engagements, sails would ensure the necessary range for long voyages without concern for fuel.[7][4]
Engines
[edit]The primary issue with Isherwood's proposal was speed. At 15 knots under steam, the ships would be the fastest in the world. In comparison, most American warships operated at around 11 knots (13 mph; 20 km/h), while British merchant ships averaged 10 knots (12 mph; 19 km/h). To achieve this speed, the design featured long, narrow hulls - similar to those of fast clippers - paired with a high-power steam propulsion system created by Isherwood. His design included eight massive boilers, four of which were equipped with superheaters, that supplied steam to four engines with 100-inch (250 cm) wide pistons. The engines drove an 18-foot (5.5 m), four-bladed propeller through a novel gearing system designed to prevent excessive vibrations that threatened to rattle the ship apart.[4][5]
His design was immediately controversial, with objections to its slender hull form, reliance on engines as the primary source of propulsion, and his engine design. One critic was Edward Dickerson, a marine engineer who argued that the design would be highly inefficient based on the later-debunked theory that steam behaved as a perfect gas. After gaining support from elements within the Navy and Congress, Dickerson was granted the opportunity to design the engines for one of the ships, which was named Idaho.[8] John Ericsson, the naval architect behind USS Monitor, also opposed the concept. His ship, Madawaska, was built identically to Isherwood's Wampanoag, with the sole difference being its engines. Additionally, the firm Merrick & Sons was permitted to design the engines for another vessel, Chattanooga, while Isherwood's engines were installed in the rest.[6][4] By diversifying the engine designs, the Navy aimed to have each design compete against one another.[6]
Overview
[edit]With variations in each engine, the dimensions of each ship varied wildly, ranging from 3,043–4,446 short tons (2,761–4,033 t; 2,717–3,970 long tons) in displacement and between 298–335 feet (91–102 m) in length.[9] Due to the ship's fine hulls, no chaser (bow-mounted) or aft guns could be mounted, which would have limited the ships' ability to engage fleeing vessels. The exception was a single 60-pound (27 kg) rifled gun mounted on a pivot, although the Navy viewed it as inadequate and questioned its ability to fire forward. Instead, the rest of the armament was mounted on the broadside; the weapons on Wampanoag consisted of ten 8-inch (20 cm) smoothbore and two 100-pound (45 kg) guns along with two 12-pound (5.4 kg) howitzers.[a][6][5] The two ships built at private shipyards, Chattanooga and Idaho, were armed with 17 and 8 guns of unspecified types, respectively.[9]
While Isherwood wanted the ships to have iron hulls, shortages made him revert to wood. The ships were rigged as barks, had a straight stem as a stern, were fitted with four funnels, and lacked watertight bulkheads inside the hull.[6][9] In the ships fitted with Isherwood's engines, significant issues arose due to their sheer size. Weighing as much as 30% of the vessel's displacement, the engines occupied an enormous amount of internal space, leaving little room for coal storage, crew accommodations, and provisions.[6][10][9]
History
[edit]_cropped.jpg)
Following the end of the Civil War in 1865, the Navy faced severe funding cuts, which left many projects abandoned.[11] The frigates, which were nearly complete, suffered construction delays as funds dried up. The last ships in the class, Neshaminy, Pompanoosus, and Bon Homme Richard, were all ultimately canceled.[9][8]
Trials
[edit]The first ship launched, Idaho, fitted with Dickerson's engines, was an immediate failure. During her trials, she reached a top speed of just 8.27 knots (9.52 mph; 15.32 km/h) - barely half the intended 15 knots.[8] Madawaska, with John Ericsson's design, briefly hit 16 knots (18 mph; 30 km/h) but could only sustain 13 knots (15 mph; 24 km/h). The failure was attributed to Ericsson designing machinery better suited for an ironclad.[4] Similarly, Chattanooga managed 13.5 knots (15.5 mph; 25.0 km/h) but failed to meet the requirement while significantly wearing out her engines. All three ships built against Isherwood's design had failed.[6]
Following further scandals over engine costs and practicality, only Wampanoag and Ammonoosuc, the two ships fitted with Isherwood's engines, were completed and became serviceable.[6][9] On her maiden voyage, Wampanoag reached a top speed of 17.75 knots (20.43 mph; 32.87 km/h), averaging 16.6 knots (19.1 mph; 30.7 km/h), making her the fastest steamship in the world and a major vindication of Isherwood's work.[8][6] Likewise, Ammonoosuc exceeded the goal by breaking 17 knots (20 mph; 31 km/h).[12] Wampanoag held the world speed record for 11 years, and no American warship surpassed her speed until 1899.[6]
Later history
[edit]After her initial failure, Idaho was retained by the Navy and stripped of her engines. She was commissioned and sent to Japan, and was sold off after a typhoon ripped off her sails in 1869. Ammonoosuc and Chattanooga were laid up after their trials, and Madawaska was fitted with new engines and rebuilt.[9]
In 1869, the Secretary of the Navy disapproved of the large number of warships named after Native American tribes and the incoherent naming conventions used across the fleet. As a result, he ordered a systematic renaming of vessels.[13] The five remaining Wampanoag-class frigates were subsequently renamed after American states.[9] That same year, the Navy assembled a board to review war-era vessels as part of budget reduction efforts. The board criticized the class, believing that their high speeds did not justify their costly operation, especially for a role that was no longer needed.[8][5] By 1870, just years after the class was launched, the entire class had been decommissioned and were gradually disposed of over the next two decades.[9]
Legacy
[edit]
The original purpose of the frigates was rendered obsolete while they were still under construction. The British government, seeking to enforce neutrality during the Civil War, eventually seized vessels built for the Confederacy and closely monitored Confederate agents to prevent further support.[8][2] After the war, the United Kingdom perceived the Wampanoag-class frigates as a potential threat, which contributed to its willingness to pay for war damage. During the Alabama Claims, Britain agreed to pay $15.5 million in compensation for the damage caused by the British-built Confederate raiders, which helped to normalize Anglo-American relations.[14][8] The Royal Navy was interested in the Wampanoag's design, which lead it to build HMS Inconstant around a similar idea that favored speed over armor and armament: a concept that would later develop into the battlecruiser.[4]
Ships in class
[edit]Due to various differences in characteristics, sources vary on what constitutes being apart of the Wampanoag class. While all eight were built during the same program and to the same general design, some sources only include Wampanoag and Ammonoosuc, while others exclude Chattanooga and Idaho.[9][4][15]
| Name | Renamed | Displacement | Trial Speed | Engines by | Builder | Laid | Launched | In service | Out of service | Fate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wampanoag | Florida | 4,215 short tons (3,824 t; 3,763 long tons) | 16.6 knots (19.1 mph; 30.7 km/h) average | Isherwood | New York Navy Yard | 1863 | 1864 | 1868 | 1869 | Scrapped 1885 |
| Madawaska | Tennessee | 4,105 short tons (3,724 t; 3,665 long tons) | 13 knots (15 mph; 24 km/h) maintained | John Ericsson | New York Navy Yard | 1865 | 1867 | Sold 1886 | ||
| Ammonoosuc | Iowa | 3,850 short tons (3,490 t; 3,440 long tons) | >17 knots (20 mph; 31 km/h) | Isherwood | Boston Navy Yard | 1864 | 1868 | 1868 | Sold 1883 | |
| Chattanooga | – | 3,043 short tons (2,761 t; 2,717 long tons) | 13.5 knots (15.5 mph; 25.0 km/h) | Merrick and Sons | William Cramp & Sons | 1864 | 1866 | 1867 | Sank 1871 | |
| Idaho | – | 3,241 short tons (2,940 t; 2,894 long tons) | 8.27 knots (9.52 mph; 15.32 km/h) | Edward Dickerson | George Steers and Co | 1864 | 1866 | 1869 | Sold 1874 | |
| Neshaminky | Arizona/Nevada | 3,850 short tons (3,490 t; 3,440 long tons) | – | Isherwood | Philadelphia Navy Yard | 1865 | – | – | Incomplete, Sold 1874 | |
| Pompanoosus | Connecticut | 4,446 short tons (4,033 t; 3,970 long tons) | – | Isherwood | Boston Navy Yard | – | – | – | Canceled | |
| Bon Homme Richard | – | – | – | – | Washington Navy Yard | – | – | – | – | Canceled |
Footnotes
[edit]References
[edit]- ^ "Liverpool's Abercromby Square and the Confederacy During the U.S. Civil War". ldhi.library.cofc.edu. Lowcountry Digital History Initiative. Archived from the original on December 14, 2024. Retrieved March 14, 2025.
- ^ a b c "Supplying Warships · Liverpool's Abercromby Square and the Confederacy During the U.S. Civil War ·". ldhi.library.cofc.edu. Lowcountry Digital History Initiative. Archived from the original on July 19, 2024. Retrieved March 14, 2025.
- ^ Quarstein, John V. (August 21, 2021). "Roll, Alabama, roll! - Sinking of CSS Alabama". Mariners' Museum and Park. Archived from the original on June 23, 2024. Retrieved March 14, 2025.
- ^ a b c d e f g Caiella, J.M. (April 2016). "The Wampanoag: 'Germ Idea' of the Battlecruiser". Naval History Magazine. 30 (2).
- ^ a b c d Small, Stephen C. (August 2002). "The Wampanoag Goes on Trial". Naval History Magazine. 16 (4). United States Naval Institute.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j Sloan, III, Edward W. (December 1965). "Isherwood's Masterpiece". Proceedings of the United States Naval Institute. 91 (12).
- ^ Sloan, Edward William (1966). Benjamin Franklin Isherwood, Naval Engineer; The Years as Engineer in Chief, 1861-1869. Annapolis, United States Naval Institute. pp. 169, 170. ISBN 978-1591147930.
- ^ a b c d e f g Gurley, Ralph R. (December 1, 1937). "The Wampanoag". Proceedings of the United States Naval Institute. 63 (12).
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k Conway's All the World's Fighting Ships, 1860-1905. Internet Archive. New York: Mayflower Books. 1979. pp. 124–125. ISBN 978-0831703028.
{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: others (link) - ^ "Wampanoag I". Naval History and Heritage Command. Archived from the original on May 25, 2024.
- ^ Silverstone, Paul H. (2006). Civil War Navies, 1855-1883. Taylor & Francis. ISBN 978-0-415-97870-5.
- ^ "USN Ships--USS Ammonoosuc (1868-1883)". October 5, 2014. Archived from the original on October 5, 2014.
- ^ "The Evolution of Ship Naming in the U.S. Navy". Naval History and Heritage Command. Archived from the original on February 10, 2025.
- ^ "Milestones in the History of U.S. Foreign Relations - Office of the Historian". history.state.gov. Office of the Historian, United States Department of State. Archived from the original on February 15, 2025. Retrieved March 16, 2025.
- ^ Silverstone, Paul H. (2006). "Unarmored Steam Vessels". Civil War Navies, 1855-1883. Taylor & Francis. pp. 19–20. ISBN 978-0-415-97870-5.